In the depths of a protracted crisis that has shattered lives and torn communities apart, one voice stood out — not from political pulpits or state authority, but from the heart of art and culture. The late Ratan Thiyam, internationally acclaimed theatre director and cultural visionary, reminded us of a simple yet powerful truth: we have coexisted for over 2,000 years — why not more, if misunderstanding is resolved?
In a special interview with journalist Karan Thapar during the sixth week of the Manipur crisis, Ratan Thiyam’s words echoed what the people desperately needed to hear — a call for unity, peace, and collective healing. His belief in a united Manipur was not driven by political ambition or opportunism. It stemmed from decades of nurturing art, bridging communities, and holding on to the idea of a shared destiny. He didn’t stop at reflection; he pledged to continue urging the Prime Minister to intervene, to listen, and to act, treating Manipur not as a distant frontier but as an inseparable part of the nation.
Sadly, his passing leaves behind not just a cultural void but also a moral one. For when statesmen remain silent, when leaders hesitate and institutions falter, voices like his become the last light in a dark tunnel. One is left wondering — what if our elected representatives had shown the same moral courage? Even under the limitations of President’s Rule, a unified, persistent call from those who claim to represent the people could have made a difference. Instead of waiting endlessly for others to act, our leaders could have rallied for peace, led the reconciliation, and demanded urgent intervention.
The imposition of Article 356 in Manipur is not just an administrative development; it is an admission of failure — political, social, and constitutional. But even under President’s Rule, law must take its own course swiftly and justly. Those who have instigated this crisis, regardless of affiliation, must be identified and brought to justice. Peace cannot be restored until accountability is ensured.
A glaring question remains: why are Kuki militants still in possession of sophisticated weapons under the so-called Suspension of Operations (SoO) agreement? It defies logic and reason. Weapons do not suspend their lethality. They kill, maim, and deepen the wounds of an already devastated society. Allowing heavily armed groups to operate under a truce that has repeatedly failed its purpose is nothing short of state negligence.
Manipur does not need more committees or hollow reassurances. It needs voices that are courageous enough to speak the truth and a system willing to uphold it. Ratan Thiyam believed in a united, peaceful Manipur. That belief must not die with him.
The need of the hour is clear: disarm the militants, deliver justice, and let those in power act — not as distant administrators, but as protectors of a people longing for peace.