The Manipur Government’s decision to continue security operations in the wake of the recent security developments is a welcome step towards addressing the longstanding concerns of the people. The firm position expressed by the Home Minister regarding the continuation of security operations, particularly in the context of the Suspension of Operations (SoO) agreement, reflects the government’s recognition of public sentiment and the need to address security concerns through concrete action.
Speaking to reporters at the SEEDS Complex in Sangaithel following the launch of the SEEDS Green Legacy Orchard, the Home Minister stated that the state government would continue security operations as long as the SoO agreement remained unextended. He further indicated that both the Centre and the state government understood public sentiment surrounding the decision not to renew the agreement. This statement is significant, as people have repeatedly raised concerns over alleged violations of SoO ground rules and the activities of armed groups operating under the arrangement.
The recent security operation at Sinai Camp, a designated camp under the SoO arrangement in Kangpokpi district, following the October 19, 2026, attack at Khongbal Sunurok Uyok Hill, in which three Meitei civilians were killed and several others injured, has further reinforced public expectations for decisive security measures. The operation and deployment of security personnel at the camp address a longstanding demand raised by various civil society organisations (CSOs) and sections of the public.
For years, CSOs and concerned citizens had expressed apprehensions over alleged violations of SoO ground rules and questioned the effectiveness of monitoring designated camps. Although the authorities had maintained that periodic inspections were being conducted, public concerns continued to remain unresolved. Against this backdrop, the government’s recent action at Sinai Camp and the Home Minister’s assurance that security operations would continue represent a positive development. Such a response deserves appreciation, as it demonstrates the importance of responding to public concerns through timely security measures.
However, the Home Minister must now extend this approach beyond designated camps and give equal attention to the safety of ordinary citizens, particularly farmers preparing to return to their agricultural fields during the paddy cultivation season.
Last year, farmers reportedly faced attacks while working in their paddy fields, allegedly carried out by Kuki militants. These incidents created fear among farming communities and prompted repeated demands for security protection. With the cultivation season approaching, similar apprehensions are emerging in vulnerable peripheral areas of Bishnupur and Imphal West districts.
Agriculture is a vital source of livelihood for thousands of families in Manipur. Farmers cannot be expected to work in their fields under constant fear of armed attacks. Their safety must be treated as an essential responsibility of the government.
In this regard, the Home Minister should take the initiative to direct the concerned security agencies to establish adequate security arrangements in vulnerable agricultural areas before cultivation activities reach their peak. Regular security patrols, strategic deployment of personnel, effective intelligence gathering and prompt response mechanisms should be ensured, particularly in areas bordering sensitive zones.
The government’s recent action at Sinai Camp has raised hopes among the people. The Home Minister’s firm expression on continuing security operations is a welcome step, but its effectiveness must also be reflected in the everyday security of people living and working in vulnerable areas.
Preventive action is always better than a response after the loss of innocent lives. The Home Minister should seize this opportunity to strengthen security arrangements across the peripheral areas and ensure that farmers can cultivate their fields without fear.
The people expect not merely assurances but visible and sustained security measures. Protecting farmers means protecting their livelihoods, ensuring food security and restoring public confidence. The government must ensure that no farmer is left vulnerable while performing the essential task of cultivating the land.
Leader writer: Sh Ajit
