The indefinite bandh imposed by the Foothills Naga Coordination Committee (FNCC) across Naga-inhabited foothill areas of Manipur entered its tenth day on Sunday, amid mounting tensions, widespread disruptions, and growing criticism of the state government’s silence.
Launched at midnight on July 18, the bandh is being observed in protest against multiple grievances, including the proposed construction of the German and Tiger roads through what FNCC terms as Naga ancestral land without prior consultation, the continued presence of illegal Suspension of Operation (SoO) camps of Kuki militants, and unchecked poppy cultivation in the region.
Road blockades have been firmly enforced at key locations such as Makhan in Kangpokpi district, Tongjei Maril (Old Cachar Road), Dolang Chiru, Tupul to Noney Road, Tupul-Noney Junction, and Longsai-Khoupum Road in Noney district. FNCC volunteers are reported to be strictly monitoring the movement of vehicles, especially restricting those belonging to the Kuki community, further exacerbating ethnic tensions on the ground.
Speaking to the press, FNCC Secretary B. Robin Kabui stated that the prolonged silence of the government in the face of their demands is deeply regrettable. “We have been peaceful and patient, but the state’s refusal to engage or respond is unacceptable. Should any unfortunate incidents arise, the government must bear full responsibility,” he warned.
The FNCC has described its ongoing protest as a peaceful assertion of the rights and security of the Naga people. It says the agitation is aimed at defending their ancestral land, cultural identity, and the safety of their communities in the face of growing external pressures.
The bandh has received significant backing from Naga civil society groups across Manipur, who have echoed the FNCC’s concerns over the alleged marginalisation of indigenous rights and lack of meaningful consultation on matters affecting their land and future.
Despite the widespread impact on daily life and increasing pressure from Naga bodies, the state government has not issued any official statement so far, drawing criticism from various quarters for what is being seen as administrative indifference to a sensitive and escalating issue.