In Meitei academia, the pursuit of critical thinking—a key element of intellectual growth—faces serious obstacles. These challenges are shaped by fear of consequences from both state and non-state actors, the influence of long-standing traditional values, and a deeply ingrained feudal social structure. Together, these forces have created an environment where academic freedom is restricted, and critical thought is viewed with suspicion.
Academic freedom is essential for any intellectual community to thrive. It allows scholars to question, debate, and explore ideas without fear of punishment. However, in the context of Manipur, this freedom is under serious threat. State actors often exercise strict control over educational institutions, closely monitoring how political and social issues are discussed. In addition to this, non-state actors—including various civil society groups and insurgent organizations—enforce their own limitations on what can and cannot be discussed, effectively making certain topics taboo.
This culture of fear has led to widespread self-censorship in academic circles. Scholars and students hesitate to engage in discussions that could be seen as controversial. In such a climate, critical thinking is stifled. Instead of challenging established ideas or questioning societal norms, many academics remain silent, either avoiding sensitive topics or offering only superficial critiques. This results in an intellectual environment where the status quo is rarely questioned, and meaningful discussions are few and far between.
Another major barrier to critical thinking in Meitei academia is the continued dominance of traditional values. Meitei society, like many others with deep cultural roots, places great importance on customs and beliefs that have been passed down through generations. While these traditions are an important part of cultural identity, they often set strict limits on what can be thought and discussed.
One of the key ways these traditional values hinder critical thinking is through the reverence for established authority, whether it comes from elders, cultural leaders, or accepted historical narratives. In a society that places great importance on respect for authority, questioning the beliefs of elders or challenging long-held assumptions is often seen as inappropriate or even rebellious. This cultural norm discourages younger scholars from pushing intellectual boundaries, as they are expected to conform to accepted viewpoints rather than explore new ideas.
A third major factor that limits critical thinking is the continued presence of a feudal mindset, where an individual’s social status often overshadows the value of their ideas. In such a system, who you are matters more than what you say. This feudal mentality gives more weight to the social standing or family background of an individual than to the content of their arguments. As a result, those from prominent families or powerful positions are more likely to be respected and listened to, even if their ideas are weak or unoriginal. Conversely, individuals from less prominent backgrounds, no matter how intellectually capable, often struggle to gain recognition.
This hierarchy of social status over intellectual merit creates an academic environment where critical thinking is diminished. Instead of evaluating ideas based on their substance, people often defer to those with more social prestige, leaving little room for genuine debate. This system also reinforces existing power structures within academia, preventing new ideas from emerging and allowing outdated modes of thinking to remain unchallenged.
Addressing these issues will require several steps. First, the academic community needs to push for stronger protections for academic freedom. Educational institutions should be places where scholars can express their ideas freely, without fear of outside interference. This will involve resisting the control imposed by both state and non-state actors who seek to limit what can be discussed in academic settings.
At the same time, Meitei society must begin to reflect on the role that traditional values play in limiting intellectual growth. Cultural traditions, while important, should not be immune to criticism. Scholars should be encouraged to question and reinterpret these traditions in ways that allow for greater intellectual freedom, rather than stifling it.
Finally, the feudal mindset that places social status above intellectual merit must be addressed. Academic institutions should be places where ideas are judged based on their quality, not on the background of the person presenting them. By breaking away from this feudal mentality, Meitei academia can create a more open environment that encourages critical thinking.
The Struggle for Critical Thinking in Meitei Academia
65