The Need for Dialogue and Security in a Post-President Rule Era

The crisis in Manipur continues to persist despite repeated assurances from the government that steps are being taken to restore normalcy. While many have pinned their hopes on the imposition of President’s Rule as a means to bring about stability, it is evident that governance alone will not resolve the deep-seated issues plaguing the state. The only way forward is through sincere and inclusive dialogue, complemented by adequate security measures. However, there are growing concerns that some in positions of power may have vested interests in prolonging the conflict, influenced by big business entities that seek to exploit the ongoing turmoil for their gain.
Manipur has been embroiled in a complex conflict, where ethnic tensions, political maneuvering, and economic ambitions intertwine. While the state reels under the weight of this crisis, rumors abound regarding powerful business interests that thrive in the chaos. It is said that well-connected businessman, who has access to both the Meitei and Kuki areas, is eyeing the rich earth minerals from Kachin (Myanmar), further complicating the situation. Such vested interests, if true, paint a grim picture of how economic greed can exacerbate the suffering of thousands.
The human cost of this prolonged conflict is immeasurable. Thousands have been displaced, families torn apart, and an entire generation left uncertain about their future. The economic backbone of the state has been shattered, and essential supplies continue to be scarce in many areas. While the common people, both Meitei and Kuki, bear the brunt of this crisis, there are those among them who are benefitting immensely from the chaos. Reports indicate that certain individuals and groups within the Kuki community are reaping economic benefits, much like their counterparts among the Meitei. This selective enrichment, while the masses suffer, only fuels further resentment and distrust.
The security situation in Manipur remains precarious. While a strong security presence is necessary to curb violence, it is not a long-term solution. A heavily militarized approach without parallel peace initiatives will only push communities further apart. The trust deficit between the people and security forces is widening, as allegations of bias and excessive force continue to surface. What is needed is a balanced strategy—one that ensures law and order while also creating an environment conducive to peace talks.
At the heart of the problem lies the deep-rooted ethnic discord between the Meitei and Kuki communities. Historical grievances, land disputes, and competition over resources have fueled animosity for decades. However, conflict will not provide a resolution—only dialogue can. Community leaders, civil society organizations, and neutral mediators must step forward to bridge the divide. The government, instead of merely deploying security forces, must actively facilitate these conversations. Without a genuine peace process, any short-term solution will eventually crumble, leading to renewed violence.
Another critical aspect that cannot be ignored is the role of the state and central governments. The failure to address grievances in a timely manner has led to disillusionment among the people. Delays in rehabilitation efforts, failure to prevent armed confrontations, and an overall lack of transparency have created an atmosphere of suspicion. If the authorities are serious about restoring peace, they must first restore public trust by demonstrating that their actions are in the best interest of the people, not corporate or political elites.
The alleged influence of big businesses in perpetuating the crisis is a matter that demands immediate scrutiny. If economic motives are indeed playing a role in sustaining the conflict, it is imperative that investigative agencies step in to unearth the truth. The government must ensure that economic exploitation does not come at the cost of human suffering. Any individual or entity found to be fueling unrest for personal gain must be held accountable.
Moving forward, the government must implement a multi-pronged approach. First, there must be an immediate push for peace talks, with representatives from all affected communities. Second, security measures must be strengthened, but with an emphasis on impartiality and public trust. Third, economic rehabilitation programs must be introduced to aid those affected by the crisis, preventing further marginalization of communities. Lastly, strict oversight is needed to prevent the exploitation of Manipur’s resources by external business interests.
Manipur stands at a crossroads. The choices made in the coming months will determine whether the state descends further into conflict or takes a step toward healing and reconciliation. The suffering of the people cannot be ignored any longer. The time for action is now, and it must be guided by the principles of justice, inclusivity, and transparency. Only through a sincere commitment to peace and security can Manipur hope to emerge from the shadows of turmoil and rebuild its future.