The ongoing crisis in Manipur continues to spiral out of control, raising critical questions about the effectiveness of the government’s response and its ability to ensure national security. Recent developments, including the resumption of attacks by Kuki militants on Meitei civilians and the disturbing speech by Mizoram’s Chief Minister Laldohoma, have intensified concerns about the state’s security and territorial integrity. These developments cast doubt on the claims of peace restoration by both the Government of Manipur and the Government of India.
On October 15, the Home Ministry organized a meeting aimed at finding a solution to the ongoing violence and initiating dialogue between the conflicting communities. However, since that meeting, there has been no meaningful follow-up or subsequent efforts to engage in peace talks or resolve the crisis. This failure to act promptly and decisively sends a concerning message that the government is not taking the violence seriously. Just days after the meeting, Kuki militants resumed their attacks on civilian Meitei populations in the periphery areas, with reports of a tragic killing of a lady farmer. These attacks indicate that the peace touted by both the state and central governments is not a reality on the ground.
The government’s assertion that peace has been restored in Manipur is increasingly difficult to accept in light of these renewed violent incidents. The violence not only continues but appears to be escalating, with little to no action taken against the militants who are directly responsible. This inaction points to a deeper problem in the government’s strategy to address the conflict and a failure to dismantle the militant groups that have disrupted the state’s fragile peace.
Furthermore, the statements made by Mizoram Chief Minister Laldohoma have added a dangerous dimension to the crisis. In his speech, Laldohoma openly called for the formation of a Christian state, which he suggested could encompass parts of India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. This declaration goes beyond mere rhetoric; it signals a clear secessionist motive that threatens the territorial integrity of India. The Chief Minister’s speech is not just an inflammatory political statement; it is an open call for the formation of an independent state, violating the principles of India’s Constitution and international law.
The government’s failure to take swift and decisive action against the Kuki militants and their supporters, particularly in the face of such provocative statements, is deeply troubling. This situation cannot be ignored, especially when such public statements directly undermine the sovereignty of the Indian state. The call for a Christian state, as stated by Laldohoma, constitutes a direct challenge to India’s unity and integrity. If left unaddressed, it could set a dangerous precedent for other separatist movements across the country, further destabilizing regions that are already struggling with communal and ethnic tensions.
The issue at hand is not just about restoring peace between the Meitei and Kuki communities. It is about preventing the further erosion of India’s national unity, especially when external and internal forces are seeking to exploit the situation. The Kuki militants’ clear objective to carve out a separate territory—spanning parts of India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh—reveals an alarming motive: the creation of a nation that violates international borders and seeks to redraw the map of the region.
What makes this even more concerning is that such separatist movements are a violation of India’s own constitutional provisions. Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution prohibits speech that undermines national security or promotes activities that threaten the sovereignty and integrity of India. The government must now take immediate action to address not only the resurgence of militant violence but also the dangerous rhetoric that encourages separatism. The public declaration made by Laldohoma should be treated as a serious violation of the Constitution, and the authorities should act decisively to curtail such sentiments.
The Indian government must also recognize the growing international dimension of the conflict. With the Kuki militants allegedly receiving support from external sources and with their actions potentially threatening India’s borders with Myanmar and Bangladesh, the situation is no longer a purely internal issue. The central government must ensure that its response is comprehensive, addressing both the militant violence and the rhetoric of secessionism. The continued delay in taking action is only allowing the situation to worsen, and further exacerbating the risks to national security.
The failure to take prompt and decisive action against Kuki militants and their supporters, especially in light of Laldohoma’s dangerous speech, is a grave misstep. It is time for the Indian government to take a hard stance against separatism and to ensure that the perpetrators of violence are held accountable. The integrity of India’s borders and the security of its citizens must be the government’s primary concern, and it is only through swift and effective action that peace can truly be restored.
Government’s Response to Kuki Militants and Challenge to National Integrity
142