Log in

Items filtered by date: Saturday, 18 August 2018 - Imphal Times - A Daily Eveninger

MU impasse not yet settled; MHRD issues order; fact finding committee reconstituted as 2 member enquiry committee; skips agreement to connect VC AP Pandey’s leave with the present MU imbroglio

IT News
Imphal, Aug 16,

Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD), Govt. of India, today issued an order for reconstitution of the fact finding committee to a 2 member enquiry committee as agreed by them during talks with representatives of the Manipur University Community on August 16. However, the dust has not been settled as another agreed point to link the leave of Vice Chancellor AP Pandey has not been reflected to the ordered issued today.
As per the order issued by the MHRD, the earlier order of July 17, 2018 has been superseded and replaced by a new 2 member enquiry committee comprising of Former Acting Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court , T Nandakumar as the Chairperson and Former Vice Chancellor of Tezpur University as member to enquire the allegation made against the VC of Manipur University.

The newly constituted enquiry committee would be free to devise its own procedure for conducting of the enquiry however, while formulating the final conclusion, the committee would ratonally consider the response of the concern persons in accordance with the principal of natural justice. Prof. AP Pandey will appear the committee as and when necessary and the committee shall submit its report within one month from today, the order mentioned.
But the part which the Manipur University community including MUSU, MUSA and MUTA for connect the leave of Prof. AP Pandey with the enquiry has not been reflected.
After 79 days, the Manipur University community had temporarily suspended the agitation for removal of VC AP Pandey after the agreement was reached between the MHRD and MU community in the presence of the Chief Minister on August 16 morning.
In the agreement, the MHRD had agreed to reconstitute the fact finding committee as an Independent two member enquiry committee chaired by Former acting Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court T. Nandakumar, which was fulfilled. But the agreed point, to put VC Prof. AP Pandey on leave during the period of enquiry until follow up action taken on the inquiry report by the Competent Authority has not been mentioned anywhere in the order.
A meeting of the MUSU, MUTA and MUSA is being held today to discuss the order on whether to accept it or to oppose it. As of now source reaching here said that the MU community is not happy with the new order as the VC AP Pandey has been seem subsided intentionally.

  • Published in News

Hill Area Autonomous District Council reiterates demands for devolution of Power

IT News
Imphal, Aug 18,

A one day political conference of the members of the hill Area Autonomous District Council held at District Council Bhavan , Chingmeirong in Imphal today reiterated the demand for implementation of the Hill Areas Autonomous District Council Acts 1971.

The one political meet deliberated to the issues of the Autonomous District Councils finally comes to the point that devolution of power is a must in letter and spirit of the Act mentioned above.
Today’s political conference also resolved to have a separate Bedget Demand Head within the State Budget under the Section 45 and Rules 32 of the District Council Act 1971 and Rules 1972 for the Manipur Hill Area Autonomous District Councils.
Other demand resolved today are – enhancement of Salary and Allowances of the 6 District Council Members and ensuring provision for pension to all Ex- members and Council employees as per Section 27 (B) of the District Councils Act, 1971 as amended Act of 2008; filling up of all categories of vacant sanctioned posts  under the 6 District Councils of Manipur  at the earliest, on acquisition of land in the Hill districts the Manipur govt. be made mandatory to obtain prior consent from the District Councils . The one day political meets also resolved that the demands be meted out within September 2018 failing which a coordination committee will be form to launch democratic agitation.

  • Published in News

Over 1.6 crore worth gold seized by Imphal Custom Division

IT News
Imphal Aug 18,

Anti Smuggling Unit of Custom Division  Imphal under the supervision of the Superintendent of the Unit yesterday seized over Rs. 1.6 crore worth gold bar from 5 persons while trying to smuggled it out from the state at Koirengei area. As per statement of the division those arrested smugglers were from Maharatra and their name have been identified as Sanjoy Kumar Krishnani, Umesh Laxmandas Darda, Jayram Ram Prabatti Manglani , Harish Nanikram Shringi and Dilip Kumar Laljani
The first 4 person were arrested from a Dimapur bound Winger Passenger Vehicle from Koirengei Checking area while the last one was arrested from North AOC.  
16 gold piece in  rectangular form  (fine gold 999.9 foriegn origin.) were found hidden in the shoes and bag while the last person who was arrested from North AOC hided the gold at his anus.

  • Published in News

AR Seizes Drugs Worth Rs 12 Crores and Contraband Items worth Rs. 24.8 lakh

IT News
Imphal, Aug 18,

In one of the biggest seizure of drugs in recent times, Assam Rifles has recovered approximate 1.3 Kgs of Brown Sugar and 1,30,000 numbers of WY tablets costing about Rs. 12 crores from village L Youjang, Moreh on 16th August. Acting on specific input from Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Imphal regarding presence of contraband in a house at village L Youjang, a team of Moreh Battalion launched a search operation in the area and located the suspected house. The house owner Mr Thangminlen Haokip son of Ngulkhojam Haokip, resident of village L Youjang was not found in the house at the time of search. On thorough checking of the house, the search team found 1.3 Kgs of Brown Sugar and 1,30,000 numbers of WY tablets weighing around 12.5 Kgs. The approximate market value of the seized items is Rs 12 crores. Recovered items were handed over to DRI Imphal.
It is pertinent to mention that the Assam Rifles has been taking resolute steps to make Manipur a drugs free State. Since March 2018, 26 Sector Assam Rifles has seized drugs worth Rs. 65 crores approximately from Tengnoupal District.
On the other hand Tengnoupal Battalion of 26 Sector Assam Rifles under the aegis of HQ IGAR (South) caught 4960 of WY tablets found inside the headlight of the Kenbo bike.
AR source said that On 16 Aug 2018, at around 1400 hours, based on specific input received regarding movement of contraband drugs from Moreh towards Tengnoupal, a black coloured Kenbo bike was stopped for checking at PVCP, Khudengthabi, Tengnoupal District. While frisking and carrying out thorough checking of baggage and vehicle, quantity 4960 of WY tablets were found inside the headlight of the Kenbo bike. Approximate cost of the contraband drug is Rs 24.8 lakh. Apprehendee Mr Jangkhongam Touthang, age 52 years, s/o Mr J Touthang, r/o Village T Bongmol, Tengnoupal District along with recovered item was handed over to Tengnoupal Police.

  • Published in News

Thoubal Keithel vendor ladies stage rally against the Chairperson of TMC

IT News
Imphal, Aug 18,
Protesting the inaction of the Thoubal Municipal Council (TMC) over the demand of the vendor ladies to clean up the of Thoubal Keithel, restoration of electricity, lifting of the garbage piled up inside the market complex and to open the toilet of the market, vendors ladies of the Thoubal Keithel today staged a protest rally till DC office.
Slogans against the Chairperson of the Thoubal Municipal Council were shouted during the rally. After reaching at Thoubal DC Complex, five representatives of the Market complex met the DC of Thoubal District H. Rosita. After the DC assured to look after the market complex the vendor ladies of Thoubal Keithel return back.
Speaking to reporters , a vendor lady said that , the vendor ladies vandalise the newly constructed sheds ay Thoubal Keithel on August 12 . After that the Chairperson of the TMC lock the Toilet and cut of the electricity. The TMC also stop collection of the garbage pile up inside the market complex, the vendor lay said and added that such action were never witnessed in the Thoubal Keithel before.

  • Published in News

KYKL observes 25th Martyrs’ Day

IT News
Imphal, Aug 18,

Armed Rebel group Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup (KYKL) today observed the 25th Martyrs’s day of the group.
A statement of the outfit said that the main observance function was held at 1st Battalion of the outfit. The observance was also held at its 2nd and 3rd battalion as well as at its units, technical units and at all part of Kangleipal , the statement added. It further said that main observance of the 25th Martyrs’ day held at 1st Battalion was attended by K. Korou , General Secretary of the KYKL as chief guest while Vice Chairman of the group Toijam Ibochou presided over it. Acting C-in C of of Meeyamgi Yawol Lanmee (MYL) Kh Nimai and Punshiba, the CO of 131 Bn of the KCP another armed rebel group attended the function as guest of honours.
The observance began with half mast of the party flag and by observing 2 minutes silence as a mark of respect to the martyred revolutionaries. Filling floral tribute was also paid to the martyrs.
Speaking on the occasion the acting commander in chief of the outfit elaborated on how to march ahead the revolutionary movement by recalling the spirit of sacrifice of the martyrs .
Chief guest of the observance function, General Secretary , KYKL while speaking on the occasion said that  in order to march the revolutionary movement in WESEA region the revolution should never surrender and march ahead without losing the spirit.
Vice Chairman of KYKL in his speech said that the first step require is to restored the sovereign status of the Kangleipak and WESEA region. It was after only Independence that people of the WESEA region can determine the fate of the WESEA which will enable us to make the people self sustain. He appealed the revolutionary cadres to stand firm and not to surrender to the enemy until the movement reach its goal.    

  • Published in News

Unsettle crisis


The one thing that the people of the state would perhaps be pining for at present is “if only….”.
 If only-the state government would have heeded the protests of the people and the opposition at the outset before any instrument is being finalized either for settling of the vex Naga issue. If only- the state government have understand the emotion of the public. If only- the state government have been more transparent in its dealings, especially when it concerns the interest of the public. If only- the state government have recollect the series of events that occurred in the state as the fall of wrong decision that hurt the sentiments of the people.
The present situation is a result of the failure of the state government to perform its most basic function- that of ensuring the welfare of its people- economically and politically. The perennial effort to appease the central government and to be in its good books, and worse still, to maintain and increase their coterie of unscrupulous racketeers and swindlers to do their dirty deeds and biddings have distanced the so called peoples’ representatives from the public. Distrust, suspicion and lack of communication increases as a result.
The declaration by the major civil society organization of the state as well as the main opposition political parties including Congress to convene a special state assembly session to discuss the issue and to take a consensus harms none to the ruling BJP led govt. as it is a matter of the state.
The voice of the opposition on the present steps being taken up by the state government  as not trustworthy conveys the manner in which the public have come to view those at the helm of affairs. It would not be an exaggeration to state that the present set of ministers and MLAs has shifted their focus from governance towards profiteering. Every single activity is being carried out on consideration of money and personal benefits and nothing else. The practice had thus been institutionalized leading to a trickle-down effect. When thoughts about how to remain in power filled the mind of those ruling the state, bureaucrats and other political advisor had failed to give good advice to the ministry regarding the development to see from the perspective of the Constitution. The issue of Article 370 and Article 35 which give special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir has been not studied. Counter arguments which could be established from the angle of the constitution of India which is being pending in the highest court of the country has not been studied well.  
Nothing is better when it come to the welfare of the state. Already academic activities of the Higher studies have been put to halt due to the failure to understand the sentiments of the people of the state particularly to those of the Manipur University Community.
The state is at a standstill as of today, and the hardest hit lot would have to be the people of the state when any decision has been taken by the parliament that divides the state in terms of administration. The need of the hour is to convey the message to the central government that the state of Manipur still is united over its emotional issues of integrity, for that a consensus of the state assembly is needed besides the earlier resolutions adopted as certain changes has been seen taken up to solve the issue of the NSCN-IM.  
Could the state government kindly enlighten the public as to the rationale behind such a consideration? Does it still believe that it can somehow wriggle itself out of its present quandary?
2019 is not far from today and the beauty of democracy is that certain issues which were not handled with extreme seriousness understanding the mindset of the people often ruin the fate of any political party. The alternative isn’t much comforting either, with most of the leaders being outcasts of the present government or ones who have been discarded by the people- a classic case of old wine in new bottle. The ultimate responsibility of protecting the interests of the public will therefore come down to us, the general public through our judicious choice of representatives who can dig deep and fight our fight, not someone who can shell out the highest bid for our mandate.

Manipur: The Boiling Bowl of Ethnicity

By- Dr. Aaron Lungleng

The Land of Jewel or Switzerland of India has now become the epicenter of ethnic conflict apparent to tremor any time suspected of erupting ethnic inferno. The boiling bowl lies in the North-Eastern region of Indian Sub-continent, between 23.5oN-25.3oN Latitude and 93.4oE-95.3oE Longitudes. The total area of Manipur is 22,327 sq. Km. Out of which only 2,238 sq.km is valley while, the remaining areas are covered by Hills. The people of Manipur State are distinctly grouped into three main ethnic communities. Meiteis (inclusive of the Meitei Bamon and the Meitei Pangans). Whereas, the hills are inhabited predominantly by the tribal dividing into two main ethnic-dominations namely, Nagas in the north, east and west whereas Chin-Kuki-Mizos in the South. It will be worthy to study the sensitivities among the ambiguous ethnic anthology within one administrative entity.  
The Nagas
William Watson (1961), basically for much of history, South East Asian earliest settlers were Paleolithic or pre-Paleolithic food gatherers, hunters, fishers and folk who had made the transition to stone-using culture. A Hindu epic tells the presence of the Mongoloids in India as early as 2500-2000 BC. Archaeological excavations found, such as stone and bone tools, as well as animal remains as evidence of Stone Age habitation in the four caves of Khangkhui Caves located near Khangkhui, some 11 kilometers (6.8 mi) southeast of Ukhrul District on the border with Upper Burma (Sharma, T.C. Pandey S.N. Ed. 1985). The first evidence of Pleistocene man in the northeast India dates back to about 30,000 BC. Other notable caves nearby include Hunding Caves, 11 kilometers (6.8 miles) south of Ukhrul (Ukhrul district), Purul Cave in Purul (Senapati District) and the Song Ring rock shelter in the Beyang village in Tengnoupal in Chandel district (O.K. Singh, 1984). One of archaeologist most valuable findings is a pebble chopping tool discovered in the Maring Naga village, Machi, in the Chandel district. The Marings Nagas are one of the oldest tribes of Manipur and this finds are considered as a landmark in the Paleolithic archaeology of Manipur, as it confirmed, the area was inhabited by Neolithic people from the early Stone Age or lower Paleolithic period.
New Stone Age findings in the Tharon Caves in Tamenglong district provide the first concrete evidence of Hoabinhian culture in India, a Mesolithic Southeast Asian cultural pattern based on historic finds from the village of Haobihian in North Vietnam. Similar relics have been found in Thailand at the Spirit Caves as well as in Burma and other places in Southeast Asia. Tharon is a Liangmei Naga village where the five caves and rock shelters were first explored in December 1979 by the State Archaeology Department. Tharon’s edge-ground pebble tools are similar to finds from Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines where they were used about 7000–8000 BC. Possible dates for the Neolithic age in northeast India are between 500 BC 2000 BC. It is probable that the sites are already inhabited by Neolithic men in or around 2000 BC.
Although the presence of Mongoloid groups in the Northeast region had been detected as early as 10 B.C. the Nagas had maintained little outside contact till the later part of the 13th century. The existence of Naga was mentioned by Ptolemy, the great Greek Philosopher of the 2nd century A.D., in about 150 A.D, who heard of this people during his visit to Western and Southern India as a wild people with a characteristic flat nose of the Mongol race. These Mongoloids groups in Asia took different reasons and routes to enter the present habitat. Some were due to pressure of population and some due to ecological and environmental hazards and for some, due to socio-political issues (Shinmi, 1988). “One of the factor of their migration within Asia was the expansion of the Chinese Han people pushing southwards as population grew in the valley of the Yellow River (Gerald, 1972). They filled up sub-tropical and tropical China and the pressure of population triggered the momentum which sets off ripples of migration which affected the whole of Asia (Sardesai, 1981). These immigrants’ tribe took different routes. Some took the Himalayan section which extends down through the Patkai, Arakan Yoma, and Banda Arch towards Sumatra and Java, and some took the Pacific section extend from Formosa through the Philippines, Borneo and on to Japan. Smith, 1925, Hodson, 1911, Hutton, 1921, Vissie, 2008 argued that perhaps the Nagas were among those tribes who migrated from China and settled on the way in the Naga Hills. The sinologist Derk Bodde posits in The Cambridge History of China stated that “for every man whom Meng Tian could put to work at the scene of actual construction of the Great Wall of China, dozens must have been needed to build approaching roads and to transport supplies”(Bodde 1978, p. 63). This was supported by the Han dynasty statesman Zhufu Yan’s description of Qin Shi Huang’s Ordos project in 128 BC. “When the populace had become, tired and weary, they started to disperse and escape. The orphans, the frail, the widowed and the seniors were desperately trying to escape from their appallingly derelict state and wandered away from their home (Yap 2009, p. 159).
            As of Marshall (1960), on the basis of information received from Dr. Berthold Laufer, “the early home of the peoples of Eastern Asia was in the upper reaches of the Hwang-ho or Yellow river in China and from this center, the Tibetans moved westward; the early tribes of Indo- China Southward, and the Chinese, South-East. Accepting this view of Marshall, the Nagas can be said to have followed the early tribes of Indo-China group. “The Nagas are a blend of early aboriginal populations referred to as Mongoloid peoples that migrated from China 12,000 years ago,” (Frans Welman, 2007). By discerning into the Naga legends, tales, stories and folk songs which were verbally passed on to the succeeding generations, we locate the Nagas origin in the giant Asian Civilization.
From the early period, Chinese civilization maturely developed. Elizabeth Seeger, in “The Pageant of Chinese History’, New York, 1934, writes “when the Pyramids were being built in the valley of the Nile, China too was building up her early kingdom along the Hwang-Ho, and when Babylonian wise men were studying the stars measuring the sky, Chinese were making a calendar and foretelling the eclipses.” Similarly, the Nagas believe to lead by reading human events through cosmological phenomena. They believed that if the corona of the sun is circled by a ring, it signifies the death of a chief or nobles. On the day of AZ. Phizo rainbow over Khonoma was said to witness, again prior to Issac Chishi Swu a circle on the corona was manifest and on his death, a rainbow over his native village was testified. Such were the two major events Nagas seen during their decade of resistance movement when their greatest national leaders’ die.
Nagas are a speaker of both Sino-Tibeto and Tibeto- Burmese language. Names such as ‘Hung/wung’/Tatar etc. and other names like, ‘Hungshi’ ‘Yang’ among the Tangkhul Naga traced their history to Hwang-Ho River or China. Human sacrifices when chiefs died drawn parallel practices among the Chinese and Nagas are some of the instances. The Chinese and Nagas share a common belief that the spirit of a person could work actively; these are the few illustrations of the common belief of the Sino-Nagas from the very ancient times.
            Oral traditions abound among the many Naga tribes regarding how they came, dispersed, etc., Folk songs, folk tales and stories of Nagas tells the latest waves of migration and the particular spot from where they took off are traced back to China as their root habitation. According to Shimray, R.R. (1985), the Nagas had first followed the southward movement and after reaching the coast or some island, they turned north-west, but left their brothers somewhere near the coast or perhaps in some island. They take the westward movement and finally reached Burma from there they came to the present hills. The hypothesis of the Nagas that come from the sea cost or at least from some islands is strengthened by the lifestyle of the Nagas and the ornaments being used till today. Their fondness of cowrie shells for beautifying the dress, and use of conch shells as ornaments (precious, valuable and prestigious to them are marine gastropods which are found only on the sea beaches) and the fact that the Nagas have many customs and way of life very similar to that of those living in the remote part of Borneo, Sarawak, Indonesia, Malaysia etc. indicates that their ancient abode was near the sea, if not in some Islands. It is also said that in remote past one party having pierced ears left Chiangmai area in Thailand. This group of people with pierced ears is again seen by the Burmese who know them as Na Ka (Na means ear and Ka means holes in Burmese) so in Burmese Na ka means people with holes in the ears. This event is further substantiated by the account of Burmese. “According to Burmese Census report, successive incursion of the so-called Tibeto-Burman people come from a region of western China between the source of Hwang-Ho and Yangtse-Kiang rivers” (Chatterjee, 1950).
            Many scholars of the Nagas are of the opinion that the Naga migration waves took from two directions, namely Southeast Asia and Eastern Tibet or Western China. It was followed that the Nagas passing through the mainland and the Irrawaddy and Chindwin valley during the Paleolithic or Neolithic Age had gradually moved up and finally settled at Hsawngsup, now Thangdaut in Burma (pronounced as Samsok in Tangkhul) from where they finally moved to the homeland that are occupied today. Their migration movement is traced through legends, stories and folk songs and that most of the Nagas tribe affirmed to have come out of a ‘hole’, here the hole in the earth is likely to refer to a cave or wall or to a rugged ridge (Shimray, R.R, 1985).
            Another authentic theory on Naga dispersal is that; the Nagas forefather came from a watery domain through the ‘Hourie river’ (tributary of Chindwin in Myanmar) and reached the valley and settled there, but because of mosquito menace they move northward to a place called Makhrefii (which is commonly called Makhel). Hardly, any theory may stand against this popular theory of dispersal as belief, taboo, and relics which many Nagas tribes considered as sacred to them holds the support with evidences. This sacred place is situated at Mao- Maram region 7 kilometers away from the National highway 53. The name for Makhel is ‘Makhefii’ in Mao, ‘Mekhroma’ in Angami, ‘Makhel’ in Tangkhul and ‘Mahou’ in Zelliangrong. Therefore, Makhel occupy a very important place from a historical point of view not only for the Mao alone but for the Nagas as a whole. (Maheo M. Lorho, 2004).
            The Nagas is a generic name applies to all the people inhabiting in the Naga Hills that refers to the confluence of India, China and Myanmar. The area which lies at the tri-junction is about 1, 20,000 sq.km lies within 93°E-96°E longitudes and 23 ½ °N-28°N latitudes (Raising et. al.,1994). In the word of J.P. Mills (1922), the area inhabited by the Naga is “bounded by the Hukawng valley in the northeast, the plain of Brahmaputra valley to the north-west, Cachar to the south-west and Chindwin (river) to the east. In the south, the Manipur valley roughly marks the point of contact between the Naga tribes and the very much more closely interrelated group of Kuki-Chin-Mizo tribe.
            The area of the present Nagaland State is 16,579 Sq. Km and the Nagas areas in Manipur measure 15,519 sq. Km. Many Nagas such as Somras Tangkhul, Kongyaks, Khiemngans, and Yimchungers etc. are living in the Naga Hills of Burma (Myanmar). Today, one will find the Nagas in four divided folds in India and another two folds in the province of Kachins and Shans State of Burma (Myanmar) numbering to 4 million in population” (www.tangkhul.com assessed 21/4/2010). In the Indian side, there are 16 tribes in Nagaland and 32 tribes in Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. Tanai in Kachin state of Myanmar is populated by the Tangshang Nagas while Khamti Township is populated altogether by all the Naga tribes. Around 120000 Nagas are said settle in the Naga Self-Administered Zone (Sagaing Division). Therefore, the stretch of Naga Hills in the tri-junction of China, India, and Myanmar is the home of the Nagas with its exotic culture that branched from Chinese civilization.  
            Initially, the first confrontation with the British was when Capt. Jenkins and Capt. Pamperton marched from Manipur and set foot into the land Angami region in Naga Hills in 1830 via Popolongmai and Samaguting (B.C. Allen, 1905). Then, an imaginary line within the Naga Hills stretch started to draw for the convenience of the British administration. Further, Indian after she freed from the British yoke, divided the Nagas and putting them under different administrative states such as Assam, Nagaland, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh to loosen the Nagas cultural and political solidarity. As a result, the greatest conglomeration of Nagas scattered into pieces. The present Nagaland State of 1963 came into being as an outcome of the divide and rule policy of India executed through the Naga People’s convention (NPC) to douse the flame of nationalism when the Nagas spirit runs very high for self- determination. Thus, the majority Naga population and their land are divided and placed under the sympathy of the different Indian Unitary Government. The present struggle for the self-determination is due to the repercussion of the Indian divisive politics. Historically, Nagas are not Indian subjects. The Indian national anthem openly and vibrantly declared its people and geographical landscape. The present Northeast was not at all part and parcel as well as the dream of Bharat. Rabindranath Tagore in sound mind and knowledge composed the anthem according to what and what who Bharat was. The occupation of the Nagas solely confined to the Jawaharlal Nehru egotistic interest of subjugation else the Nagas lives within a good social and political set up of socialist democratic fully in self-independent sovereign village state.
The Meities
According to Iboongohal Singh, “The original inhabitants of Manipur were the Kiratas (some tribes of Nagas), by that time, Manipur valley was full of water” (Singh, 1987:10). The present valley inhabitants (Imphal valley) were known by different names by their neighbors prior to being called the Meitei. Shans or Pongs, and the Keratis called the area Cassay, the Burmese Kathe, and the Assamese Meklee. Mythological  origin dates back to 1500 BC begin with the reign of the “Konchin Tukthapa Ipu Athoupa Pakhangpa” (Pakhangpa was the name given to him meaning “The one who knows his father”). He gave birth to seven clans. 1. Mangang, 2. Luwang, 3. Khuman, 4. Angom, 5. Moirang, 6. Khapa-Nganba, and 7. Salai-leisangthem. According to Cheitharol Kumbaba, the royal chronicle, Nongda Lairen Pakhangba (33–154 AD) was the first ruler and the creator of Meeteileipak or Kangleipak (possibly could refer to mosquitoes, ‘kang’=mosquitoes, ‘leipak’=land as mentioned in the Nagas folklores that the mosquito menace cause to migrate at a higher altitude). He was the first historical ruler whose reign began in 33 AD according to the Cheitharol Kumbaba. Contradictions surface when recorded historical facts are referred. The Ningthouja/royal dynasty recorded Panheiba (1720-1751) as the first monarch and Bodhchardra Singh (1941-1949) as the last king of the 16 monarchs of Kangleipak. Therefore, Horam observed that the origin of the Meiteis is obscure (Horam 1990, 4). This has become a subject of endless debate (Tarapot 1993, 62). Kumar states that great controversies still persist regarding the origin of the Meiteis (Kumar 2001, 3). This is because most of their written records were composed after they became Hindus and therefore are not very reliable (Bhattarcharya 1963, 180; Dun 1992, 15).
The literature shows that the name of the present Manipur was given to this land after the declaration of Hinduism as the state religion during the reign of Pamheiba (1702-1751) whose Hindu name is Garibniwaz, in the beginning of the eighteenth century (Kumar 2001, 1) that the name ‘Manipur’ came into being. According to Kumar, she (Manipur) had different indigenous names such as Tillikoktong Ahanba in Hayi Chak, Mira Pongthoklam in Haya Chak, Hanna samba konna loiba in Khunung Chak and Muwapali Mayai Sumtongpan in early Konna (Langba) Chak.  In the later ages of Konna (Langba) Chak, it was popularly known as Kanglei Pungmayol, Kangleipak, and Meitreibak. Her other names were Chakpa Langba, then Muwapali, and then Wangang Tengthong Mayung Kuiba Lemthong Maphei Pakpa and, later on she was called Poirei Meitei after the advent of Poireiton (Kumar 2001, 1-2).
The Kanglei which is now called “Kangla” was the first capital of the kingdom called “Kangleipak”. The “Kangleichas” (the valley settlers now Meitei) were the subject of this small dynasty strictly restricted to the present Imphal valley. During the reign of its 16 royal kings there were no historical accounts of the Meitei invading the Naga country and vice-versa though relatively surrounded to his kingdom. She was instead privilege to have Nagas who strongly instituted socialist democratic village state engaging internecine ferocious Head hunting that sealed any foreign invasion.
Most of the time, Meitrabak/Kangleibak was engaged in the game of throne. History would say that the defeated brother would flee to Carchar or Awa in most of their confrontations to refuge in their kingdom. Gaining their favor, they would come back to Meitrapak either in assistance of the Awa or Cachar or Ahom and in the later British East India Company. There were a number of wars between the discontented royal brothers.
In 1758, the Burmese King Alaungpaya invaded Meeteileipak. Then, Meidingu Marjit (1813–1819) who fled to Awa after defeating Chaurajit by the suzerain Awa King ruled Kangleipak for six years. The catastrophe of Chahi Taret Khuntakpa (the Seven Years Devastation (1819–26) that nearly depopulated was the outcome of annoyance or ungrateful attitude shown towards the Awa (Burmese) King who enthrone Meidingu to Meitreibak kingdom. The new king of Awa, Bagyidaw, invited Marjit to attend his coronation ceremony to pay homage to him. Marjit refused to attend the coronation, which offended the Burmese king. Thus, he sends a large force under the command of General Maha Bandula to humble Marjit. Has human grateful attitude learnt Meetrabak/ would never face such catastrophe as that brought about by the Burmese conquest and brought under the rule of Awa for the seven years between 1819 and 1826, which is known as Chahi Taret Kuntakpa in the history of Meitreibak until the British East India Company’s interest to conquest the southeast Asia surface in 1834 (Anglo Burmese War). Then on, Meitreipak fought for British Suzerainty during the Battle of Yangon (May–December 1824), Battle of Danubyu (March–April 1825), Arakan campaign (February–April 1825), 17 September 1825, an armistice and the Battle of Prome (November–December 1825) until the Burmese were forced to accept the British terms to end the war, signing the Treaty of Yandabo in February 1826.
Humiliation was not learned yet, he fled from Meitreibak to Cacahar. Seeing the kindness of the Chachari prince and weaknesses too, the fleeing prince starts vying conquest to the Cachari territory. In 1819, three brothers occupied Cachar and drove Govinda Chandra out to Sylhet.  Later, Meidingngu Gambhir Singh (1826–1834) with help from the British East India Company expelled the Burmese of Awa from Meitrabak beyond the Ningthi Turel (Chindwin River) and regained the lost Kingdom. Meidingngu Nara Singh (1844–1850) was the second cousin of Gambhir Singh and the regent. Kumidini, mother of Chandrakirti, was dissatisfied with the arrangement and fled to Cachar with her son. At the wish of the people of Meitreibak he ascended the throne in 1844 at the age of 51. He then shifted the capital from Langthabal to Kangla where he reconstructed the two statues of the Kangla Sha at Uttra made by Meidingngu Chaurajit and that the Burmese had dismantled and destroyed. The same story repeats; Meidingngu Chandrakirti (1850–86) came from Cachar, defeated Debendra and regained the throne in 1850. During his reign, all the sacred and holy places inside Kangla were developed and maintained. The revolt of the throne would go on until The Anglo-Manipur War of 1891 or known as Manipur expedition. Three columns of troops from  Kohima,  Silchar and Tamu were sent to Manipur. The strongest resistance from Meitrabak took place at Khongjom on 25 April.
Ever since the inception of a princely kingdom known as Kangleipak and adoption of literature to record in its royal monarch ruled, no historical accounts mentioned either animosity nor suzerainty by its kingdom over the hill tribes (Hao) and vice versa. Meitribak might at was successively invaded subjugated three times by the Awa. But, along with the loss of Meitribak, Nagas do not lose their sovereign village state. Therefore, mentioned may not be found in any historical treaty of Meitreibak or the Awa or the Ahom and the Takhen (Tripura) that, Nagas pieces/fragments are subjected to. Unlike dynastic princely kingdom, the Nagas village state differs. To conquer/invade the Nagas one has to wage war to each and every village state in the hills. In Nagas traditional village republic state, other village does not hold any domination. Each sovereign village republic state enjoys separate autonomy and administration within their jurisdiction. In this society, the concept of submission does not subsist. The fall of the father shall be vengeance by their responsible kins or community as a whole. In such a circumstance, one may overpower anyone for some certain events, but the vengeance search party would lurk around until the heads of the games are brought home. Therefore, to venture endless warfare is undesired to the neighboring kingdom be it Ahom, Awa or the Kangleichas and even to the British. Therefore, noninterference in the Nagas affairs has been the policy ever since their first contact. So, instead of provocation, they are left isolated. Thus, semi or non-administrative zone comes about during the rule of the British East India Company. Since the ancient time, Nagas have been known to be generous and kind to the neighbors. Several times, neighboring kingdom men and royals pay a visit to the friendly Naga villages; they were treated as an honored guest due to generations’ contacts through trade even in the time of headhunting. Their sympathetic treatment cannot therefore be taken as conquest in any sense. Today the dynastic princely subjects called the Kangleichas the central valley (Imphal valley), which is made up of only 700 square miles (Singh, 1980).
The origin of the Meiteis cannot be precisely determined from the literature available. Horam observed that the origin of the Meiteis is obscure (Horam 1990, 4). Scholars differ sharply in their opinion on whether the Meiteis are Aryans or Mongoloids. There are those who claim that the Meiteis are descendants of Arjuna of Mahabharata and are therefore Aryan in origin. But the journey of Arjuna to Manipur by the sea cannot be Manipur/Kangleipak found in the Mahabharata.
Referring the folk tales, the mitei is the younger brother of the Nagas. Therefore, without the representation of the Nagas, Leiharaoba/Haojongba cannot be observed. This tradition is still practiced till today. “There can be little doubt that some time or other the Naga tribes to the north made one of their chiefs Rajah of Manipur, and that his family, while, like the Manchus in China and other conquerors, adopting the civilization of the country, retained some of their old customs. This is shown in the curious practice of Ranee appearing in Naga costume; also in the palace a house built like a Naga’s, and wherever he goes, he is attended by two or three Manipuris with Naga arms and accoutrements” (Sir James Johnstone, 1896). From time immemorial Nagas and Meitie does not, neither raid or conquering. It is suspected that a policy of inflicting one another and subjugation was not adopted between them which must be due to their bond of common descendant/brotherhood. Naturally, by origin if the elder brother is a Mongoloid than, younger brother must belong to the same unless matrimonial intervene to become blended or otherwise. So, traditional theory, which is widely accepted by scholars and writers, is that the Meiteis originated from the Mongoloid race. Historians and scholars such as Roy, Thumra, Horam, Hodson, N. Tombi Singh, and Parratt support this tradition. N. Tombi Singh, a Meitei scholar, states, “Many... think that there is a basic difference between the valley people of Manipur (Meiteis) and those who are in hill areas. In fact, it is not so. The entire people of Manipur belong to the same ethnic group and trace their origin more or less to the Sino-Tibetan group of human species.” (Singh, 1972). Despite the various claim, “It is difficult for the Meiteis to claim any racial purity due to their long stories of migration and a series of invasion by the Aryans, Shans, and Myanmar” (Singh 1988, 149). Beyond doubt, Meitei would show an admixture of race as seen through the many invasions by awe or expulsion to Ahom and Cachar. Such blended communities cannot be easily ascertained to one racial stock anthropologically. Yet, the majority of the population would manifest a mongoloid racial physiology due to intermingled to the same racial carrier than the smaller immigrant Bengali stock. Yet, Mongoloid-Aryans blended race existence is an admitted fact. “However, it is beyond doubt that they originally belonged to the Mongoloid race. Another group of Meitei people, who are the Brahmins believed to have come from Bengal with the coming of Hindu Vaishnavism during the seventeenth century. They are altogether a different people group, probably belonging to the Aryan race” (Rimai, 2017).
The Kuki
Sir James Johnstone (1896) said that the original home of the Kukis cannot be correctly ascertained, but there seem to be traces of them as far as south of the Malay Peninsula. Once during Hudon was on expedition in the south they happen to come across a travelling band and when asked where was their home, this was what T.C Hudon (1911) quoted the words of Kuki chief, “we are like birds of the air, we make our nests here this year, and who knows where we shall build next year”. It makes one understand beyond doubt that the Kukis are migrant nomadic tribe migrating from places to places up till the beginning of the 20th century. Whereas, the Nagas and Meiteis at that time had already set up a proper village state on the other hand the Meitie had established their own kingdom.
The probability of the Kukis migrating upward from the Burma cannot be amenable. But the genesis of the word ‘Kuki’ is woven into confusion and complexity. It is best guess that the term ‘Kuki’ must be given by the outsiders.
The precise description of Kuki by G. A. Grierson reveals in his Linguistic Survey of India, Voll-III, Part-III, Culcutta, 1904, P. 23 that, the Kukis, are migrants, shifting their village sites every 4 or 5 years and never take to permanent irrigation and terraced rice cultivation by means of irrigation. Their cattle are invariably ‘Methun’. On the other hand, Nagas had permanent village sites and permanent irrigated and terraced rice fields and they keep ordinary Indian cattle. While Miri, Mrinal (2003) states that there is no historical information about the Kuki before the 19th century. Likewise, Johnstone, states that, Kuki settlement in Manipur was started from 1830 (Manipur and Naga Hills, 1896, p. 25) which affirms that Kukis are the last immigrants into the present northeast states of India.
Earlier, this Tibeto-Burman language speaker Kuki spread throughout northwestern Burma, and the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Now in Northeast India, they are present in all the states except Arunachal Pradesh. “This dispersal across international borders is a culmination of punitive actions made by the British during their occupation of India” (T. Haokip, 2013). At some point of time, ‘Chin’ or ‘Kuki’ or ‘Lushai/Zos’ were compounded taking as synonymous. It was due to social and political isolation even non-Kukis are also at random amalgamate into the fold of Kuki speciously by the outsiders. On the basis of linguistic affinity G. A. Grierson placed the so-called Chin-Lushai-Kuki people in the Kuki-Chin group of Tibeto-Burman family. He, however, correctly states that the people do not themselves recognize these names (G A Grierson, Linguistic Survey of India. Vol. III Part III, Calcutta 1904,) thereby a generic group such as ‘Khulmi’ who claimed to have originated from a ‘Khul’ meaning a ‘cave’ are said to be a total distinct ethnic group from the Kukis. Similarly, the Hmars (scattered in different parts of North-East India and Burma, most of them live in Churachandpur district and concentrate in and around Tipaimukh, Vangai ranges and Jiribam areas) strongly protested to be called a sub tribe of Kuki on the grounds that– the Hmars never called themselves even from their forefathers and would never do so in future. They believed that they were also originated from ‘Suilung’ somewhere in china similar to the Paite who believed that they were originated from “Chinnuai” (Chinwe) somewhere from Southern part of China or Chin hills. Different Zomi tribes hold the common belief that they originally emerged out of a cave or hole. This mythological cave is known by various names like Khuul, Khur, Khurpui, Khurtu-bijur, Sinlung, Chinlung, etc. by various tribes like Thadou (Shaw 1929:24-26), Lushai (Shakespear: 1912), Lakher (Parry 1976:4), Tedim/Paite-Chin (Kamkhenthang 1967:1-2) and Moyon-Monsang, etc. There is another Chin-Kuki-Mizo group who claimed to be a ‘lost tribe’ of Israel, a descendent of Bnei Menashe. Several hundreds have immigrated back to Israel during the late 1990’s. Due to such different notion of ethnicity resulted to Hmar-Kuki conflict in I960 and in 1997-1998 there was an instance of violent ethnic clash between the Thadous and the Paites owing to the policy of Kukiazation. Dr. H. Kamkhenthang therefore, contends that Kuki or Chin terms are used only in reference to the outside world, but not in use among and within the group. The ethnos of belonging to the Chin-Kuki group did not have a common name anymore after it was disowned by the ethnoses who were once known as Kuki. Excepting Thadou, most of the tribes now want to identify themselves by their individual tribal names and not as Kukis. [Dr.  H. Kamkhenthang, “Groping for Identity”, pp. 1-16.].
Discourse on Peaceful Co-existence
1. Claim over land and dominance: From the documented historical views, land and dominance among the Nagas and Meitei does not overlap in Manipur but ethnically and distinctly marked since time immemorial. Both Hill and valley coexist in friendliness without any imposition or subjugation to one another. Ever since the inception of Princely state or settlement of the Republic village states, it is observed that they were not invasive nor interfering but protective yet sympathetic to one another. Therefore, Ibobi’s “the land belongs to the state” is a rhetoric statement and a sacrilege to universal human rights. Such notion is trepidation to peaceful coexistence within complex and assorted ethnic identities. One has to understand the reality of imaginary demarcation for one time convenience (as seen in the conquest/conquered status) is impermanent, but, distort historical rights over inheritance and uniqueness of one’s nation. However, it is apparent to refine and reshape as- ‘there is a time for everything under heaven’. Another, unfortunate claim over the land right considering Kukis are the indigenous dominant ethnic group of Manipur and that the Kukis were in supreme command over all the hills and valley of Manipur. Sominthang Doungel (Secy Political Affairs Kuki Inpi Manipur) claimed that Kukis are the overlord to the hills East of Imphal valley extended up to the Burma border contiguous to the Thongdut State and part of Somra Tract. The western and northwestern part of Imphal Valley, the Lushei Hills of Assam, the North-West and the Imphal Valley in the North-East, the areas were occupied by the Manluns (Zou), the South-East of Imphal valley extending upto the areas of Kabo Valley, The Doungel-Kuki chief, the North-East of Imphal Valley, extending Chingai sub-division of Ukhrul district to the un-administered area of Somra Tract (SOMINTHANG DOUNGEL). Secy. Political Affairs Kuki Inpi Manipur). According to him, we could conclude that Mizoram, Manipur and part of Burma is the homeland of the Kukis. Such rhetorical claim is a direct insult either to the Meitei or the Nagas and the Zomis who are the aboriginal since time immemorial. However, the turning down the owner as non-existence on top of that, the Nagas ancestral land is termed as rather absurd, ridiculous and unfounded. The concocted story cannot become history. The Kuki appearance in Manipur was said to be during the 1850s who came into Naga ancestral lands in Manipur after they were defeated by the Burmese. Nowhere in the history Kukis are recorded neither aboriginal nor dominant ethnic group in Manipur either by the Britisher or the Chronicle of the Kings except to mention as a nomadic immigrant or refugee from Burma and Chittagong Hill track. Further, the President of Manipur State Darbar issued by Captain Harvey Order No. 11 of 18.8.1931 declared that the Kukis were not permitted the use of Fire Arms due to their savagery acts being committed against the Nagas and for jeopardizing the peaceful atmospheres in the hilly Naga territory. In the part 2 of the same Order, the Kukis were granted Fire Arms on loan merely for protections against wild animals only. The standing Order of the President Manipur State Dabur, TA Sharp in his Order No. 9 of 09.09 1933 declared that the Kukis shall pay annual House tax to the Chief of the Naga Village a sum of Rs.6/ per annum. Again, the standing Order of the President of Manipur State Dabar T.A Sharp in his Order No. 2 of 23.7.1941 declared that, the Kukis shall obtain prior permissions from Naga Village Chief for settlement within the Naga territory.
The refugee status is reaffirmed by the relief fund that was sanctioned to a bona fide refugee in 1970s, during R. Suisa (first Naga Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha of Indian) who sympathize the pathetic condition of the Burmese Chin ethnic Kukis refugees in Manipur. The Refugee Relief Fund was sanctioned by the Finance Ministry of Home affairs GOI, Vide Memo P. 3/9/66 and payment was made to the Kuki refugees through the State Govt. of Manipur Vide. Memo No. 01/R/RFL and the amounts of which were distributed to the Kukis refugees as follows – 1. First payment: 22 April, 1957, 2. Second payment: 07 July, 1959, 3. Third payment: 28 February, 1966 and 4. Fourth payment: 18 July, 1968 respectively.
The Kuki INPI needs to refrain from propagating false genesis to the younger generation, because imagination is more beautiful than reality. Reality is harsh and freezing, therefore, it is always the best not to play politics at the cost of their thousands future. So, usher peaceful coexistence rather than provoking the generosity of the landlord. Today’s, false propagators will pass away, but it is their generations to harvest the impregnated concocted lies. Deviation from reality- the future of the Kukis refugees’ status blight as Rohingas of Rakhine, Burma and the Tibetans refugees in India in the aftermath of the Indo-Nagas political settlement. It is strongly convicted that even though Kukis (Thadous) are refugees, they are well treated as equal and gives equal opportunity in all spheres of life within Nagalim. Such hospitality will never earn equally from other nations.
Ones’ civilization cannot trace from others evolution and claim the areas surpassing their own genesis (migration, decent, customs, tradition and believe). What human don’t want? - Unlimited! Restraining ones want in reverence to others’ wants make living undemanding to access, gain peace and harmony. Further, if one is a brother nothing remains other than saying- what belong to me is yours; my achievement is ours and vice versa. The only thing we lack is consciousness in tracing common descent and heritage. This should be the common exercise for the Nagas and the Meitei and expose accommodating gesture towards the other.
2. Civil Organization: In respect of social organizations, there are a number of organizations said to be working for the general, whereas in the truest sense, it exposes that they represents for a section of the community even if it bears the great nomenclature envisage the whole state. There seems to have no commonness and a united platform in Manipur to address social issues jointly. Instances like; AMUCO (All Manipur United Committee Organization), UCM (United Committee Manipur) etc. are valley based organization represented by Meitei confined to fight for Meitei community is strongly seen over and over again. On the other hand, the ATSUM (All Tribal Student Union Manipur, UNC (United Naga Council) etc. Do not hinder nor interfere in the aspirations of the Meitei but the socio-cultural and political identity of the tribe and the Nagas in particular.  The later Chin-Mizo- Kuki have several civil organizations. During the Mizo Accord all the contiguous areas of Chin-Mizo could not materialize so Chin- Mizo living in Churanpur district does not perform as a puffer society between the Meitei and the Nagas nor the Kukis who scattered in the Valley and the Hill cannot act as an intermediate community between the autochthonous aboriginal. Besides, civil organization, social media and human rights activist are also undoubtedly bias in their own ethnic line.3.      Political and administrative quandary: In a democratic system of government, some of the ethical ideals of democracy are equal representation meaning, that all groups are fairly represented adequately and accurately by all communities to safeguard diversity. Again, democracy must cooperate and compromise to protect the individual / groups’ rights to be indifferent. For this, a climate of tolerance is critical. It invests long-term fair policy, thereby promoting good governance to create conditions for economic growth and sustainable development focus on the future generations’ prospects. Despite the principle of majority rule, it centered on the maintenance of decentralized and local government bodies.
      In a democracy, it needs to understand that all levels of government should be accessible to, and equally represents the people to develop dynamic democratic State. Such insight, lack in Manipur political and administrative policies, as the elucidation shows the lopsided representation in the Manipur Legislative Assembly and unfair policies of the Manipur government. The 4 valley districts have 40 seats while the 5 hill districts have 20 seats. If Imphal East and Thoubal have 11 and 10 seats respectively why don’t Senapati, which has more population, but given just 6 seats? How about Churachandpur and Bishnupur to have 6 seats, which is more or less the half of Senapati district pollution? Ukhrul, the second largest district, with a population of almost 2 lacs has just 3 representatives which mean around 60,000 and Chandel around 70,000 people are represented by 1 MLA. While in the valley the 1 MLA represents for around 40,000 people. Mao has 52,128 voters, while 55-Tipaimukh has just 17,478 voters. Some of the constituencies in the Imphal Valley have a population of just around 20,000. The population ratio of the valley and hill districts is approximately 58/42 but the representation in the State Legislative Assembly it is 40/20. This is one of the simple example how valley framed malicious policy to rule the state according to their convenience. In fact, the valley (Meitei) is less than the trials, but due to absorbing the tribal population in the valley makes the majority in population for first hand priority. On the other hand, when it comes to the state share (quota), more than 60 percent will be left to the Meitei Generals while the remaining 40 will be allotted for OBC/ST in various states’ civil services. Such are the pull and push policies of an iniquitous state holding community.
      The valley districts occupy just 9 percent of the total area of the state, which is only 2,238 Sq.km but the most of the funds of the state, almost all funds are kept for development purposes in the valley districts and negligible percent will be allotted to the Hills. The philosophy of the valley inhabitants in aspects of development is very much visual like placement of all the state/central institutions in the valley, e.g., Medical Institute (RIMS), Universities inclusive of Polytechnic, IIT, Tribal University, IGNOU, Colleges (Imphal), Sports stadium/complex etc. are all centered within Imphal in the radius of Meitei reached. Not only that, in any tenders or in (contract work) in the Hills without the Meiteis involvement in the given work will not materialize is an open secret.
      To conclude, the boiling bowl needs to control through the search of peaceful coexistence as a common brother and realize that they hold a common future. Peace and Love is not one sided so the search for prosperity should be from both angles so as to find a common end.
 (Concluded)
**The writer is an anthropologist and can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


NSCN-K impeaches its Chairman Lt. Gen. Khango

IT News
Imphal, Aug 17,

National Socialist Council of Nagaland ( NSCN – K had  impeached its chairman Khango Konyak,  and elected the outfit’s founding chairman, late Shangwang Shangyung Khaplang’s nephew, Yung Aung as the new ‘acting chairman’ of the organisation.
It may be recalled after NSCN leader Khaplang passed away last year, the leadership was handed over to the senior most leader Khango Konyak.
The communiqué signed by emergency session chairman, Kilonser Chowangsing stated that impeachment motion was conducted in compliance with the constitution of the NSCN. Khango has been found guilty of violating the party principles on various charges including ‘Absolute control of power and functions without collective leadership.’
“His impeachment had become necessary to save the party from further breakdown and confusion. All powers, functions and privileges he has been enjoying have been withdrawn”, the press communiqué said. Following his impeachment, Yung Aung shall has been given charged as the new chairman as decided by the NSCN, the released added.
The statement mentions that the party shall reserve its respect and honour for Lt.Gen. Khango in his position as the senior-most party member. Recognizing his long service the NSCN allowed a safe passage for him from the party unharmed.
Aung, 45 years old, studied in Manipur till his graduation and is known to be an expert in martial arts and polo.
As per reported at times of India, Khango has left the NSCN (K) headquarters in Sagaing region of  Myanmar along with some of his loyalists. Few top leaders of Indian-origin are believed to have gone with Khango. When Khaplang, a Hemi Naga from Myanmar, died in June last year and the leadership was passed on to Khango Konyak, a Naga from India, it gave Indian government hopes of breakthrough with the outfit, the only Naga outfit which is outside the peace process, as it tries to work out an all-inclusive solution to the Naga political problem. Indian security forces believed that would always be easier to talk to the leadership of Indian origin than that of Myanmar. NSCN (K) abrogated the ceasefire with the Indian government in 2015.
Apart from Khango, the outfit’s powerful army commander, Niki Sumi, is also an Indian-origin Naga.
The NSCN(K), which is based in Myanmar, wants an agreement with the Myanmar government to cover ethnic Nagas living in India who are known as western nagas. Those in Myanmar are locally known as eastern Nagas but the outfits believe that both belong to one Naga territory despite the international border dividing them.
NSCN (K) has a ceasefire agreement with Myanmar since April 2012 and has refrained from clashes since 2000. Recently the Myanmerse government has made it clear that it would not allow NSCN (K) to sign the national peace agreement if does not give up its demand for separation.

  • Published in News

Tree plantation at Machengpat, Andro

IT News
Imphal, Aug 18,
Members of Machengpat Youth Club Andro along with councilor of Andro Nagar Panchayat Ward No. 1 , Yumkhaibam Sanjoy today planted around 1000 sapling on both the road sides of Andro Machengpat road in Imphal East today morning.

  • Published in News
Subscribe to this RSS feed